I would assume as a Lesbian she already has most, or all, of those 4Bs covered. :D
You actually bring up an interesting point (between this message and the last one). The women I have noticed who seem to want the fewest restrictions put on abortion are usually in groups (older, lesbian) who are not very likely to be getting pregnant.
Maybe I am wrong there but that is my observation.
IB Joe wrote to jimmylogan <=-
On 10 Nov 2024, jimmylogan said the following...
That's the crux of the matter. All of this talk about 'freedom' is
freedom to murder. SMH
I think the only way to fix this is give the unborn constitutional
rights.
Alan Ianson wrote to jimmylogan <=-
jimmylogan wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
There was just a vote for president, but there was no vote for
abortion. Why should/would there be?
Did you read my comments on representative republic? People vote for
and against issues every time they elect a senetor or representative,
or even a school board member or county commissioner.
What I am saying is those representatives are going against the will of the people (in this matter).
Since the majority of voters are sending conservatives to my state legislation, the lawmakers are supporting defendig the unborn.
It doesn't matter to me much if the people have voted conservative or
not. Those representatives are not representing the will of the people
(in this matter).
Actually, since Donald Trump is saying the states are now voting on it maybe there should be a vote. Was there a vote for it in Tennessee.
Not on the ballet this year, becasue - again - the majority are conservative because that is what is being sent to the legislature
each year.
Maybe it doesn't need to be on the ballot if women already have these rights. I don't know if that is the case in in Tennesse.
Why does your beliefs on the matter mean more than the womans?
It doesn't, but it should matter equally. The unborn hasn't reached
a voting age yet, just like a toddler or teen hasn't. I'm simply expressing my desire that they not be sacrificed.
If you are simply expressing your desire I have no issue.
It is when demanding a woman do this or that against her own wishes
that I take issue. A womand should have the right to privacy, and to
make her own decisions.
Ron L. wrote to jimmylogan <=-
jimmylogan wrote to Dr. What <=-
This is a good point! Tennessee is a 'gun toting' state. I won't shoot
you in the back for stealing my television, but I will defend myself
and others if you threaten by coming into my house while I am home.
Exactly. Did you notice in the Democrat Summer of Love that all of the riots occurred in Left-run areas? Everyone else would have shot back.
Mike Powell wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-
Why does your beliefs on the matter mean more than the womans?
It doesn't, but it should matter equally. The unborn hasn't reached
a voting age yet, just like a toddler or teen hasn't. I'm simply
expressing my desire that they not be sacrificed.
It should be based on viability age. Living toddlers and teens are viable. Many late-term premature babies are viable without extensive
life support. Most early term premature babies are very much not
viable.
That makes a very logical cut-off point.
They are alive, for the record...
jimmylogan wrote to Dr. What <=-
Remember the man and woman in St. Louis that defended their home with
the THREAT of shooting? And the state attourney, I think it was, wanted
to prosecute them?
It should be based on viability age. Living toddlers and teens are viable. Many late-term premature babies are viable without extensive life support. Most early term premature babies are very much not
viable.
That makes a very logical cut-off point.
Though I disagree that that should be the 'cut-off,' I would GLADLY
go along with that as opposed to abortion on demand - any time, any
reason. At least it's a step in the right direction...
Sysop: | fluid |
---|---|
Location: | wickliffe, ohio |
Users: | 5 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 216:32:47 |
Calls: | 50 |
Files: | 15,838 |
Messages: | 50,906 |