Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
It's some kind of sick elitist game.
Many people use photos that they are not even in... like photos of the family dog... so your photo is probably not the problem. As Kurt pointed out, what is likely getting you in trouble with account #2 is that
they've figured out you are trying to skirt the ban on account #1.
Many people use photos that they are not even in... like photos of the family dog... so your photo is probably not the problem. As Kurt pointed out, what is likely getting you in trouble with account #2 is that they've figured out you are trying to skirt the ban on account #1.
I'm guilty of that, but the ban on account #1 was the same thing; they did it without any justification that I can relate to.
Don Vally wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-
Ha ha - wait, was that supposed to be funny? Why would we need an AI
to help us understand? Wait, I might need one to chime in on your
comment...
Wow, that one went way over your head.
Many people use photos that they are not even in... like photos of family dog... so your photo is probably not the problem. As Kurt po out, what is likely getting you in trouble with account #2 is that they've figured out you are trying to skirt the ban on account #1.
I'm guilty of that, but the ban on account #1 was the same thing; they d without any justification that I can relate to.
Did you ever send them proof for account #1?
Sysop: | fluid |
---|---|
Location: | wickliffe, ohio |
Users: | 4 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 92:49:21 |
Calls: | 52 |
Files: | 15,838 |
Messages: | 53,834 |