Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Television viewers are not trained to handle rebuttals or "what ifs."
Meanwhile, there was a famous orangutan at the Atlanta Zoo named
"Chantek" who was able to handle back-and-forth communication through American Sign Language.
Maybe someday we can get the researchers from that zoo to have back-and-forth communication with our leftists.
Maybe someday we can get the researchers from that zoo to have back-and-forth communication with our leftists.
Not possible.
As I've said before: You can't have a discussion with these people.
Most people enter a discussion with the idea "I think I'm right, but I'm willing to listen to you and I might change my mind." Lefties enter a discussion with an attitude of "I'm right and I need to explain to you
why you are wrong."
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
They think that I'm going to cool off and leave them alone, but I'm
going to be on their asses for at least the next 9 years.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
We need someone to do a thorough investigation into the root causes of leftism. The TV is obviously a smoking gun, universities are additional evidence, but we need a map of all the sources so we can tackle it all
in a comprehensive way. It was amusing before, but now it's got way out
of hand.
We need someone to do a thorough investigation into the root causes o leftism. The TV is obviously a smoking gun, universities are addition evidence, but we need a map of all the sources so we can tackle it al in a comprehensive way. It was amusing before, but now it's got way o of hand.
We already know the causes: All academia - all the way back to Kindergarten. And all Media.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Those are definitely the 2 worst offenders. To tackle the media issue
we'd need billions of dollars worth of broadcasting equipment.
It seems like the academia issue could be solved by the Trump administration. I snitched on the school board for their DEI practices
to the US Department of Education, but I have yet to hear back from
them.
We are already tackling the media issue.
We aren't listening/watching anymore. The current media companies are
in big financial difficulties today. IHMO: They were being propped up
by money from somewhere. Now that the NGOs have been defunded (for the most part), it's probably coming from Soros-like Elitists. But that
won't be the case for the long term.
Elimination of the Dept. of Ed was a good start. What we need is for
1. Elimination of the teacher's union. It's obviously not for the teachers. 2. Elimination of rules prohibiting someone from setting up their own school. 3. School of Choice regulations so that the money for
a student follows the student to the school chosen. No more double-pay
if you want to sent your kid to a private school.
a student follows the student to the school chosen. No more double-pay
if you want to sent your kid to a private school.
We are reaching that point soon. Home schooling is on the rise.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
We're defeating the media by taking their funding sources away? I agree
to some extent; PBS lost their funding I guess. But we need to do more.
I don't think the Dept. of Ed has been eliminated yet, but supposedly there have been workforce reductions there, which is a good start.
Is there any legitimate reason for unions (of any sort) to still exist?
We have laws. If employers don't follow them, they get fined and/or
sued. Isn't that good enough?
Which level of government has the power to stop unions? I'm guessing
it's the state.
My daughter will finish high school before it ever happens, but I'm
hoping that charter schools become an option for my youngest kid.
to some extent; PBS lost their funding I guess. But we need to do mor
I can't think of much more than making the Elitists pay to prop up a
media source that is only viewed by their brainwashed masses.
Already the legacy media has almost no power to change people's minds anymore. They are getting sued for defamation and slander - and losing. There was a time when The View, for example, had to apologize on air for something false that they said.
Is there any legitimate reason for unions (of any sort) to still exis
No. There was never a legitimate reason for unions to exist past getting workplace safety standards passed.
Today they are all corrupt, power hungry groups that use workers to have power.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
They keep rambling though, and I still find parrots all over the place. There has been some improvement since the last election (that was a
wake up call for a lot of idiots) but I just hope that thinking for the self is trending up.
That's what I mean. Their catchphrase seems to be "You can't be fired tomorrow," which sounds good to people who don't take work seriously.
The worst one was when a UAW member was caught by the DEA selling
illegal drugs on GM property. The DEA arrested him. GM fired him. But the UAW's stand "we'll fight for him to get his job back when he gets out."
| Sysop: | fluid |
|---|---|
| Location: | wickliffe, ohio |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 82:06:12 |
| Calls: | 52 |
| Files: | 15,838 |
| Messages: | 56,111 |